Gather ‘Round Children
This was on the Jawa Report, but it needs to be shown to everybody.
This is the new low of liberals. All of their playing at compassion has come crashing down in the last week. They want to put women back in the kitchen and daycare is suddenly no good for liberals. Amazingly, all of that, and creating a playboy cover with Sarah Palin, is not enough. They need to have a blog written by Trig, her downs syndrome baby.
If anyone finds out who made this abomination of a site, please send them my way. I want this piece of trash to be famous.
Here is a picture from the blog. I don’t know who this kid is in the picture. The blog says it’s Trig.
It is titled:
-
(subtitle) Cause she’s the vice-present. Will you love Trig?
I dare you liberals to defend this garbage. You are throwing away your election.
September 5th, 2008 - 8:18 pm
…and you KNOW this is a liberal how?
Prove it. For all I know YOU put that crap on the web for the outrage and attention. Either way, whomever put it up is simply a douchebag, no other label conservative or liberal need apply.
That part about liberals wanting to put women back in the kitchen was priceless. The right-wing, champion of minorities and womens rights. Who knew?
September 5th, 2008 - 8:38 pm
Who knew? Not you. You should turn on the TV or read Cobb.
Okay, I don’t know it is a liberal. It could be an evil conservative faking the whole thing.
Yeah, that makes more sense.
The evidence is in the writing, if you read it. It is the typical liberal falsehoods advanced against Sarah Palin, like the intelligent design obsession.
It also has the tedious ring of long winded liberals who think they are clever by:
Mocking Sarah’s beauty.
Mocking McCain’s POW experience.
Mocking abstinence only education.
Mocking her daughter for being pregnant, constantly.
But, it might be a conservative double agent.
September 5th, 2008 - 8:58 pm
There’s no such thing as “typical liberal falsehoods”. This person is a low life with poor taste.
Sarah is alright looking, not my type, but I admit she looks great for 44. I would have guessed her 10 years younger. She stays fit which is awesome. I disagree with her policy stances, not her looks.
McCain doesn’t have to defend his P.O.W. experiences. Hell no military man need defend himself on his service. Makes me wonder why I bother with your crap.
Abstinence Only NEEDS TO BE MOCKED. It doesn’t work. I mean the evidence is staring you right in the face on National Television. What more do you want? It is unfortunate her daughter is pregnant especially if it is unintentional. Pregnancy isn’t the only result of unprotected sex. STD’s, cervical cancer, plenty of more scary stuff.
You don’t think this hasn’t happened before? You think it’s beneath some wacky right-wing nut? You have nuts in your party just like we have them in ours. You should realize that all Republicans/Democrats aren’t the same. But this conversation is devolving into silliness again. Have a good weekend. Have a beer, go out, quit thinking about all this political stuff.
On another note, you should check out a beer called “La Fin du Monde” (don’t worry it’s Canadian not French). Triple fermented, 9% alcohol, and tastes damn good. You won’t be disappointed. Cheers
September 5th, 2008 - 9:01 pm
I am not sure anyone needs to defend anything at all. It’s pretty cut-and-dried that the Downs Baby website there is tasteless. I guess since you synonymize tasteless with “librul” it automatically follows that a liberal must have done it. Although my guess would be a liberal with poor taste.
Of course using your Down’s baby and the poor decision-making process that goes into keeping that baby as a political pawn to checkmate the religious right for McCain…priceless. It does deserve to be praised and mocked. Palin is ruthless. But also quite clueless, check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QG1vPYbRB7k
Jesus wants the pipeline..yes!!!
[ADMIN: Okay, goober. Stop linking stuff.]
September 5th, 2008 - 9:33 pm
catscratch
you stated
“Of course using your Down’s baby and the poor decision-making process that goes into keeping that baby…”
Now, I know you aren’t implying that a baby that has Down’s is any less human than a child that doesn’t and therefore should be aborted?
You have proven a point that the majority of liberals would rather play God on one hand and deny that there is one in the other.
September 5th, 2008 - 10:05 pm
“Hell no military man need defend himself on his service. Makes me wonder why I bother with your crap.”
I never attacked your service, you attacked me for thanking you for it. Something about the special olympics.
You put up with my crap because you love me and I accept all of the unwanted children with love.
“Abstinence Only NEEDS TO BE MOCKED. It doesn’t work.”
Yeah, not having sex causes all of these babies to fall out everywhere.
Bringing up her pregnant daughter is the way to Barack’s defeat. I am telling you, Cobb said it as well.
I know you didn’t mean anything about her there, but it has traveled into third rail territory.
Barack Obama will be beaten by his own supporters.
The French are cool now. Hell, they are the fighting French now.
Good night and good luck…
to John McCain and Sarah Palin!
Bwhahahaha!
September 5th, 2008 - 10:09 pm
Dude, it’s Friday night. Truce. Go have that beer (seriously man, it’s good stuff), we’ll pick this up tomorrow.
September 5th, 2008 - 10:16 pm
Catscratch, what is up man? You are letting your utilitarian side show.
You said “keeping that baby as a political pawn” c’mon.
You might want to examine that language, your thoughts are showing.
September 5th, 2008 - 10:57 pm
If my thoughts weren’t showing, then my language would have failed utterly. Perhaps you should take care that your words contain more thoughts?
As for this:
“Now, I know you aren’t implying that a baby that has Down’s is any less human than a child that doesn’t and therefore should be aborted?”
I didn’t say less human. But learn a bit about Down’s syndrome, realize that it is usually an affliction brought on by too-old parents shtooking, and that it really is an awful way to live. But since every blastocyst is a life, a human soul, it must be preserved at all costs…right? Why not take that “reasoning” all the way back to the gametes and try any man who loses a testicle for the murder of millions.
“You have proven a point that the majority of liberals would rather play God on one hand and deny that there is one in the other.”
No, you have drawn that point from thin air so you can make some kind of point about religion and liberals. It’s pretty much completely disconnected from anything anyone said, but it was an excuse for you to defend God from the nonexistent attack since He wasn’t here to defend himself.
September 5th, 2008 - 11:07 pm
Hey catscratch, you corrected the degree of punishment against Adam Kokesh and you should have stopped there.
You confused the two comments above.
I only said the first line.
September 5th, 2008 - 11:30 pm
You’re right, I mixed replies. Should have mentioned that one was from you, the other from “Yes I served”. My apologies.