The story goes: “A former brother-in-law of Hanson’s estranged wife Carolyn’s brother…” and they gave this guy a huge story.
Dr. Rusty did not fail, and properly pointed out a wild sex story about Barack Obama.
This story was not from any one’s brother’s cousin’s friend’s aunt’s adopted cat either. This story came right from the mouth of a guy who said Obama’s penis was in that same mouth. An eyewitness if you will.
This guy has plenty of issues and I would guess he is making stuff up. It is about as interesting as an affair at an Alaskan snowmobile dealership, except for the murdered gay pastors.
September 24th, 2008 - 9:41 pm
Hmmm Rude, strange but the only Palin smear stuff I see in general is here.
I don’t think your average Democrat (liberal if you will) actually goes looking for this crap. Most people right and left have better things to do with their day. All of this digging for dirt is from the far winged fanatics…right and left. So please don’t think typical liberal.
Anyway, there are for better reasons not to like her. I choose to stick to a disagreement about her stance on policy…or lack of knowledge of policy..or anything for that matter.
I mean seriously, all partisan crap aside for a minute. Does having a quick “meeting” with third world leaders really bolster her credibility or does it bring attention to her lack of experience? This really seems like a joke to have her meet Foreign leaders for a photo-op without reporters around. For all we know they could have talked about shoes. If I were on your team, I’d be groaning about McCain and Palin’s handlers are botching things. There are alot of ways to make both of them look better than they are. Do you think someone is trying to throw this election because the powers that be really don’t like McCain?
Anyway. I want to hear some debates about issues head to head. Oh wait. Your team has called time out. Whatever happened to multi-tasking? What happens when the country gets hit with a financial and foreign policy crisis at the same time? Does McCain call time out? I know he wouldn’t be able to, but this leaves an impression, and not a very good one. As always, hope things are well in your neck of the woods.
September 24th, 2008 - 9:45 pm
And about the rest of that crap…why do you perpetuate it here? I mean it can’t do anything for the credibility of your blog…it’s the National Enquirer (so they got one right with Edwards) for godsakes. And that other freak is just an idiot. He should be sued by the Obama campaign for harrassment. But then again, ignoring idiots is probably for the best.
September 24th, 2008 - 11:13 pm
Howdy DMG, I see you brought your intellect here for the challenge of jokes and a cartoon dog. Very well.
No team called time out on running a country, our guy just remembered he is a still a Senator.
Obama backed out on many opportunities to debate McCain. Ten town hall style debates if I remember right.
Sarah Palin is not diminished one bit to conservatives and every single American who thinks the media is left-biased. Those that think the media is neutral, share your viewpoint.
As far as issues forget it. Obama dropped the ball to see what happened this week, so he can criticize it. That was his plan. McCain is actually going to Washington.
As for Obama’s problems, if he could sue that guy he would.
He can’t, because that case would ruin Obama. That campaign is one of the most litigious campaigns in history.
The Sinclair dude looks suspect anyway. Now that Hillary is out of the running, the press is no longer interested.
As for credibility, the cartoon dog in the corner should clue you in.
If TRN is credible to liberals, then it is as bad as the New York Times.
September 24th, 2008 - 11:21 pm
DMG, here is a little gift, so you understand the credibility issue here.
It is the biggest retraction ever on TRN. It was my error alone; I was called out by another blogger.
There have been a few other corrections on this site, but this is still my favorite one.
http://www.therudenews.com/archives/844
September 25th, 2008 - 11:13 am
I don’t think you got my point. The stories you have above is SO FAR out of the park that they aren’t even fit to print in jest.
Don’t go off on the NYTimes. You know they at least do their homework. And McCain, for instance, never really answered why Davis was still receiving payments from Freddie as of last month. He just got pissed at the NYT. He leaves us to assume it’s true.
Not that you aren’t trying, but one example where you get cornered and forced to admit fault doesn’t give you credibility. You have to have a good long track record.
Your site has the makings of a place for decent debate, if you take out all of the far off opinions and National Enquirer type stuff. But maybe that’s not what you are going for…
Now isn’t this civil conversation better than threatening to kick each others asses?
September 25th, 2008 - 12:03 pm
I got your point, but I am not the media printing that stuff. Go tell to them.
The NYT doesn’t do homework. They don’t even work, unless it’s for liberals.
I was never cornered and forced to admit anything. When something substantial was brought to my attention, I did my homework and fixed it. Unlike the NYT.
TRN is not a discussion forum. It’s run by a cartoon. Don’t think your efforts are not appreciated; it’s just that I have no time to indulge my trolls. I print most of your stuff because you try so hard, but these are the last of my indulgences. There are too many propaganda assignments on my desk.
As far as threatening, I was just cutting the head off of a snake. People can go back there and judge for themselves who was out of line.
http://www.therudenews.com/archives/1125
But yes, this is much better. I am glad you learned. :p
September 25th, 2008 - 7:51 pm
Rude,
OK. Well then let me ask you this: If it’s run by a cartoon, are you just trying to be outlandish? I suspected that you were at least trying to be a little serious by how hard you argue. I’m curious. I assume since you have a space for replies that you actually WANT people to join in. It wouldn’t be any fun just to put crazy ass stuff up online if you can’t talk about it.
Well if you just want to put up propaganda, that’s cool too. It IS your site. But I hope you won’t mind if I come by and break a few balls on occasion. That’s what friends are for right?
Again, hope all is well with you and yours.
September 25th, 2008 - 11:10 pm
Man I think it’s pretty good for a cartoon dog to keep you hooked.
Bwahahahaha!