<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The CAIR Bears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178</link>
	<description>Real Political Incorrectness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:09:17 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Rude Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/comment-page-6#comment-8135</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rude Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therudenews.com/?p=178#comment-8135</guid>
		<description>Allan baby, 

When I (The Rude Dog) post, it says &quot;The Rude Dog.&quot;

When it says &quot;admin&quot; it&#039;s &quot;admin.&quot;

When someone says:

&quot;Hey dog...&quot; They are talking to me.

Read slower pal. You should have stopped with &quot;It&#039;s just too amazing to top.&quot;

That&#039;s where you peaked :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allan baby, </p>
<p>When I (The Rude Dog) post, it says &#8220;The Rude Dog.&#8221;</p>
<p>When it says &#8220;admin&#8221; it&#8217;s &#8220;admin.&#8221;</p>
<p>When someone says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey dog&#8230;&#8221; They are talking to me.</p>
<p>Read slower pal. You should have stopped with &#8220;It&#8217;s just too amazing to top.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where you peaked <img src='http://www.therudenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Innes</title>
		<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/comment-page-6#comment-8127</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Innes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therudenews.com/?p=178#comment-8127</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s appropriate to call me a clown and a troll (I&#039;ll have to look up trolling because I thought the criteria were different), but I was actually arguing against pretentiousness (in photography) in the link you just provided. If my replies are harassing you, I&#039;ll gladly stop. I wasn&#039;t aware I was offending you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s appropriate to call me a clown and a troll (I&#8217;ll have to look up trolling because I thought the criteria were different), but I was actually arguing against pretentiousness (in photography) in the link you just provided. If my replies are harassing you, I&#8217;ll gladly stop. I wasn&#8217;t aware I was offending you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rude Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/comment-page-6#comment-8125</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rude Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therudenews.com/?p=178#comment-8125</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’ll refrain from closing with a cool remark like “thanks for playing.” It’s just too amazing to top.&quot;

Is that the refrain were you announce you are going to refrain and then sound sooo ironic?

You are too cool for school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’ll refrain from closing with a cool remark like “thanks for playing.” It’s just too amazing to top.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that the refrain were you announce you are going to refrain and then sound sooo ironic?</p>
<p>You are too cool for school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/comment-page-6#comment-8124</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therudenews.com/?p=178#comment-8124</guid>
		<description>Hey dog, this clown trolls anything he can touch:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/squareformat/discuss/72157594586742829/#comment72157621647716031

That&#039;s him Darling&#039;s Despair. What pretentious fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey dog, this clown trolls anything he can touch:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/squareformat/discuss/72157594586742829/#comment72157621647716031" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.flickr.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/groups/squareformat/discuss/72157594586742829/#comment72157621647716031</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s him Darling&#8217;s Despair. What pretentious fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Innes</title>
		<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/comment-page-6#comment-8123</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Innes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therudenews.com/?p=178#comment-8123</guid>
		<description>&quot;You have the viewpoint of many college kids and their hippy left over profs.&quot;

I can tell you from personal experience that even within this context, where schools are in fact quite &quot;liberal&quot;, there is very little love or understanding for the Palestinians. Once a group is given the &quot;terrorism&quot; label, even the most extreme &quot;leftists&quot; will hate them.

My point, for the Israel-Palestine issue, is that if you look at the definition, and then look at the actions from both sides, you will see that both are guilty of terrorism. If you don&#039;t see this, then you hold double standards. That is fine. Most people do hold such standards. Just don&#039;t proceed to call yourself politically incorrect or truth-providing (as news should be).

I&#039;ll refrain from closing with a cool remark like &quot;thanks for playing.&quot; It&#039;s just too amazing to top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You have the viewpoint of many college kids and their hippy left over profs.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can tell you from personal experience that even within this context, where schools are in fact quite &#8220;liberal&#8221;, there is very little love or understanding for the Palestinians. Once a group is given the &#8220;terrorism&#8221; label, even the most extreme &#8220;leftists&#8221; will hate them.</p>
<p>My point, for the Israel-Palestine issue, is that if you look at the definition, and then look at the actions from both sides, you will see that both are guilty of terrorism. If you don&#8217;t see this, then you hold double standards. That is fine. Most people do hold such standards. Just don&#8217;t proceed to call yourself politically incorrect or truth-providing (as news should be).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll refrain from closing with a cool remark like &#8220;thanks for playing.&#8221; It&#8217;s just too amazing to top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rude Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/comment-page-6#comment-8121</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rude Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therudenews.com/?p=178#comment-8121</guid>
		<description>You do not have a &quot;radical viewpoint&quot;.
You have the viewpoint of many college kids and their hippy left over profs. Or perhaps the view of a Jihadist.

&quot;I am talking about states… specifically state terrorism&quot;

Specifically a the only state run by Jews in a sea of Jihadist wackos.

Thanks for playing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do not have a &#8220;radical viewpoint&#8221;.<br />
You have the viewpoint of many college kids and their hippy left over profs. Or perhaps the view of a Jihadist.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am talking about states… specifically state terrorism&#8221;</p>
<p>Specifically a the only state run by Jews in a sea of Jihadist wackos.</p>
<p>Thanks for playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Innes</title>
		<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/comment-page-6#comment-8120</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Innes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therudenews.com/?p=178#comment-8120</guid>
		<description>1. I am not a liberal. In fact, the one &quot;bear&quot; that I can agree with, looking at the factual record, is the Obama Bear. I have no ties to these political categories that are created to define our viewpoints.

2. Either you missed my argument in bringing up the United Nations, or you simply saw the mentioning of it and decided to lash out towards it. My reason for bringing up the United Nations, in particular Resolution 242, was to show that the entire world (outside of the United States and Israel) supports the recognition of a Palestinian state on the June 1967 borders. I have no love for the UN in terms of their accomplishments (or lack there of) - I do see the potential in it, though.

3. Do not attribute me to being racist towards the Jews. I never made these claims, and never even mentioned the Jewish people. I am talking about states... specifically state terrorism. I do not believe that the United States is a representation of my person or character, nor do I hold Israel and Jews to be a singular entity. As such, many Israeli Jews are dramatically opposed to their state&#039;s acts of terrorism.

4. If China, in the face of strong U.S. opposition, annexed the Western half of this nation, then you would cling to your right to defend your country, to defend your land from foreign occupiers. I do not doubt you&#039;d grab a rifle. Yet, you hold double standards for the non-Western world. Remember, you could have been born anywhere. You and I are both privileged to be in this country, but our freedoms and our luxuries exist largely on the sweat and blood of the non-West, and I can&#039;t sit back and enjoy them because of such.

5. People do things for a reason. They get violent for a reason. If you dismiss this fundamental fact when looking at the Arab world, then you demonise them.

6. Finally, you still have yet to answer the initial issue: How are you politically incorrect? It would seem that I am the one with the &quot;radical&quot; viewpoint, as most of the U.S. public would disagree with me. How are you not just an extension of other mainstream news? You have yet to show me this. Where do you get your information from, aside from news organisations? You are but a limb, an extension, nothing more. I doubt you&#039;ve read any reports or findings on the situations you &quot;broadcast&quot; on. You seem to me... and this is just my opinion... you seem to me to be a simple puppet with an opinion. But your opinions only go so far as to guide which political hand is inside of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I am not a liberal. In fact, the one &#8220;bear&#8221; that I can agree with, looking at the factual record, is the Obama Bear. I have no ties to these political categories that are created to define our viewpoints.</p>
<p>2. Either you missed my argument in bringing up the United Nations, or you simply saw the mentioning of it and decided to lash out towards it. My reason for bringing up the United Nations, in particular Resolution 242, was to show that the entire world (outside of the United States and Israel) supports the recognition of a Palestinian state on the June 1967 borders. I have no love for the UN in terms of their accomplishments (or lack there of) &#8211; I do see the potential in it, though.</p>
<p>3. Do not attribute me to being racist towards the Jews. I never made these claims, and never even mentioned the Jewish people. I am talking about states&#8230; specifically state terrorism. I do not believe that the United States is a representation of my person or character, nor do I hold Israel and Jews to be a singular entity. As such, many Israeli Jews are dramatically opposed to their state&#8217;s acts of terrorism.</p>
<p>4. If China, in the face of strong U.S. opposition, annexed the Western half of this nation, then you would cling to your right to defend your country, to defend your land from foreign occupiers. I do not doubt you&#8217;d grab a rifle. Yet, you hold double standards for the non-Western world. Remember, you could have been born anywhere. You and I are both privileged to be in this country, but our freedoms and our luxuries exist largely on the sweat and blood of the non-West, and I can&#8217;t sit back and enjoy them because of such.</p>
<p>5. People do things for a reason. They get violent for a reason. If you dismiss this fundamental fact when looking at the Arab world, then you demonise them.</p>
<p>6. Finally, you still have yet to answer the initial issue: How are you politically incorrect? It would seem that I am the one with the &#8220;radical&#8221; viewpoint, as most of the U.S. public would disagree with me. How are you not just an extension of other mainstream news? You have yet to show me this. Where do you get your information from, aside from news organisations? You are but a limb, an extension, nothing more. I doubt you&#8217;ve read any reports or findings on the situations you &#8220;broadcast&#8221; on. You seem to me&#8230; and this is just my opinion&#8230; you seem to me to be a simple puppet with an opinion. But your opinions only go so far as to guide which political hand is inside of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZweezilDappa</title>
		<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/comment-page-6#comment-8060</link>
		<dc:creator>ZweezilDappa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therudenews.com/?p=178#comment-8060</guid>
		<description>Fuck the U.N.!
That faux resolution 242 was put on the Israelis AFTER the six day war. Egypt put hundreds of tanks of the border, threatening Israel and every Islamic group weighed in against Israel.
The English drew up that crap resolution and it was obviously crap because nobody can get the rock chucking, dynamite dildo brigade to STFU.
The U.N. is utterly useless and this Innes asshole can&#039;t deliver one place where the U fuckin N saved a nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck the U.N.!<br />
That faux resolution 242 was put on the Israelis AFTER the six day war. Egypt put hundreds of tanks of the border, threatening Israel and every Islamic group weighed in against Israel.<br />
The English drew up that crap resolution and it was obviously crap because nobody can get the rock chucking, dynamite dildo brigade to STFU.<br />
The U.N. is utterly useless and this Innes asshole can&#8217;t deliver one place where the U fuckin N saved a nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rude Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/comment-page-6#comment-8059</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rude Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therudenews.com/?p=178#comment-8059</guid>
		<description>You will often find that, in an Internet argument, those with the facts on their side usually enjoy themselves and see the terrorist teddy bears, Kangaroo Judges, Barack Obama demotivators and various other clues on their way in. While those who pretend at being knowledgeable are the worst of posers… and reflect as much in their pretentious tone.

&quot;Look into UN resolution 242...&quot;
Yeah that worked out huh? When Menachem Begin blew the Brits asses right out their beds, the U.N. wasn&#039;t so tough after that. Being a real American, I seem to remember some dudes in powdered wigs who weren&#039;t down with &quot;International Law&quot; in their time. I don&#039;t think the Kenyans and Indians were down with it either.
Let&#039;s see you liberals enforce 242, right after the U.N.&#039;s IAEA stops nukes in Iran.

&quot;Look into the International Court of Justice...&quot; 
Umm... No. Nope, they can kiss our American asses. They don&#039;t count. 

You know what? You don&#039;t count either. Look at that rambling ass book you wrote. A million words to say
&quot;It&#039;s the evil Jooooos!&quot;
&quot;The juice did my peeps wrong!&quot;
You are just another Jihadist romantic/liberal terror goblin enabler/9-11 Truther with evil joo conspiracies dork.
Take your pick and take your useless and fantastical U.N. worship elsewhere.

Screw the U.N.

Give that property to Trump. Give Donald a bailout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will often find that, in an Internet argument, those with the facts on their side usually enjoy themselves and see the terrorist teddy bears, Kangaroo Judges, Barack Obama demotivators and various other clues on their way in. While those who pretend at being knowledgeable are the worst of posers… and reflect as much in their pretentious tone.</p>
<p>&#8220;Look into UN resolution 242&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Yeah that worked out huh? When Menachem Begin blew the Brits asses right out their beds, the U.N. wasn&#8217;t so tough after that. Being a real American, I seem to remember some dudes in powdered wigs who weren&#8217;t down with &#8220;International Law&#8221; in their time. I don&#8217;t think the Kenyans and Indians were down with it either.<br />
Let&#8217;s see you liberals enforce 242, right after the U.N.&#8217;s IAEA stops nukes in Iran.</p>
<p>&#8220;Look into the International Court of Justice&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Umm&#8230; No. Nope, they can kiss our American asses. They don&#8217;t count. </p>
<p>You know what? You don&#8217;t count either. Look at that rambling ass book you wrote. A million words to say<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s the evil Jooooos!&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The juice did my peeps wrong!&#8221;<br />
You are just another Jihadist romantic/liberal terror goblin enabler/9-11 Truther with evil joo conspiracies dork.<br />
Take your pick and take your useless and fantastical U.N. worship elsewhere.</p>
<p>Screw the U.N.</p>
<p>Give that property to Trump. Give Donald a bailout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Innes</title>
		<link>http://www.therudenews.com/archives/178/comment-page-6#comment-8055</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Innes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therudenews.com/?p=178#comment-8055</guid>
		<description>You will often find that, in an argument, those with the facts on their side usually remain calm, while those whose claims are based in blind anger... reflect as much in their tone.

The Israel-Palestine is not complicated. It is not controversial. Look into UN resolution 242, along with the yearly votes accompanying it for the past 3 decades. This information is available on the United Nations website. Look into the International Court of Justice&#039;s ruling on the partition wall in the Occupied Territories - in order to rule on the legality of the wall, they first had to rule on the legality of the territories. This information is also available on the ICJ&#039;s website. It is inadmissible to acquire land by war. If you are against the Palestinian struggle, then you should be against the American Revolution, as well - though I must assume that you are very attached to and in love with, the latter. I completely understand questioning the tactics of Hamas, but you become a hypocrite when you fail to acknowledge Israel&#039;s state terrorism. You can&#039;t understand suicide bombing? It is &quot;weird&quot; to you. That&#039;s reasonable. See, I doubt you ever had your parents killed, your home bulldozed, or a life lived in poverty (the Gaza Strip has an 80% poverty rate, a 40% unemployment rate, and 44.4% of its population are children - CIA Fact Book online). Now, whether you blame the Palestinians or the Israelis for these figures, you could hopefully at least understand how the conditions are prime for breeding suicide bombers. Any simple historian recognises the fundamental link between poverty and violence.

In response to my own question (&quot;who are the real terrorists?&quot;): I will go with the people who illegally acquired land via war, illegally seeded it with settlers, fired artillery, one-ton bombs, and white phosphorus into civilians neighbourhoods (mainstream investigations by various organisations show little to no evidence of Hamas rockets fired from homes or schools), implemented the admitted Dahiya strategy, imprisoned and tortured (without trial) thousands of people, cast a blanket of starvation and disease over a civilian population, etc. etc. etc.

Please do look up the accepted definitions of terrorism. You can even use the one found within the Patriot Act. Its criteria applies equally to Israel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will often find that, in an argument, those with the facts on their side usually remain calm, while those whose claims are based in blind anger&#8230; reflect as much in their tone.</p>
<p>The Israel-Palestine is not complicated. It is not controversial. Look into UN resolution 242, along with the yearly votes accompanying it for the past 3 decades. This information is available on the United Nations website. Look into the International Court of Justice&#8217;s ruling on the partition wall in the Occupied Territories &#8211; in order to rule on the legality of the wall, they first had to rule on the legality of the territories. This information is also available on the ICJ&#8217;s website. It is inadmissible to acquire land by war. If you are against the Palestinian struggle, then you should be against the American Revolution, as well &#8211; though I must assume that you are very attached to and in love with, the latter. I completely understand questioning the tactics of Hamas, but you become a hypocrite when you fail to acknowledge Israel&#8217;s state terrorism. You can&#8217;t understand suicide bombing? It is &#8220;weird&#8221; to you. That&#8217;s reasonable. See, I doubt you ever had your parents killed, your home bulldozed, or a life lived in poverty (the Gaza Strip has an 80% poverty rate, a 40% unemployment rate, and 44.4% of its population are children &#8211; CIA Fact Book online). Now, whether you blame the Palestinians or the Israelis for these figures, you could hopefully at least understand how the conditions are prime for breeding suicide bombers. Any simple historian recognises the fundamental link between poverty and violence.</p>
<p>In response to my own question (&#8220;who are the real terrorists?&#8221;): I will go with the people who illegally acquired land via war, illegally seeded it with settlers, fired artillery, one-ton bombs, and white phosphorus into civilians neighbourhoods (mainstream investigations by various organisations show little to no evidence of Hamas rockets fired from homes or schools), implemented the admitted Dahiya strategy, imprisoned and tortured (without trial) thousands of people, cast a blanket of starvation and disease over a civilian population, etc. etc. etc.</p>
<p>Please do look up the accepted definitions of terrorism. You can even use the one found within the Patriot Act. Its criteria applies equally to Israel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
