Comments on: War Costs An Arm & A Leg

By: The Rude Dog

The Rude Dog — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:19:59 +0000

Well that just didn’t pass the smell test,

http://www.factcheck.org/funding_for_veterans_up_27_but_democrats.html

…and socailism does not work. This “military socialism” talking point is weak.

After all of our military spending, what is our net profit? Negative $.

The military is an expense.

If you do the same to our markets, we will get the same result.

Regarding “liberal” – It’s pretty clear the post is referring to bureaucracy, which you libs call “job creation”

Stalin attacked people who were not left enough, and the Hitler crap is lame.

Sex scandal? I remember witness tampering and perjury. Get off of Crooks and Liars.

Alluding to nazism because you don’t like the post means you can go elsewhere.
Try Daily Kos, it’s more your speed.

Thanks for serving.

By: en route encore

en route encore — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:05:20 +0000

howdy all… i have another vacation coming up, all expense paid trip to some where hot. I am Clinton era enlistee who is still doing what he is told. The uniform issue. NG and Reserve soldiers are not given a Uniform allotment, they recieve theirs before they leave. Some supply distros (civilian run) do collect issued equipment back. If the uniform wasn’t washed they may have written the guy a statement of charges. Since the body armor fiasco (guys armor was shot to shreds and he was charged for it in afghanistan 2003) all CIF’s are to accept all equipment regardless of condition, unless dirty. Next comment. What do you call something that provides free health care, free schooling, free living accomodations, free food, free clothing? If it were a government you call it socialism… The Military is the largest socialistic enterprise in the United States. People hear socialism and they think lazy and handouts. This is just one instance that it works. Next note, as someone who already has a VA disability rating, I applaud Clinton for his efforts in the VA. He tripled the VA budget during his tenure. Neither Regean or Papa Bush came close to his efforts. Draft dodger you say? I think he made up for it in the long run. Sex scandal you say? I say he should have found a hotter chick and no one would have cared.
Last point, Army, liberal? are you kidding me? The Army still has some incredibly repressive and strict laws. Do not get caught in anything but the missionary position or you will be seeing an Article 15. Socialism does not equate liberalism, remember that Stalin and Hitler both targetted those considered “liberals” too.

By: Yes I Served

Yes I Served — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:26:10 +0000

I’m not sure where this whole turning in the uniform thing started.
When I got out of the service I kept my uniforms. We were allotted a yearly uniform allowance to buy new uniforms if needed. Otherwise, if somehow our uniform was damaged or lost it was up to the individual to purchase a replacement.
But that was before Cliton took over as “Commander in Chief” I’m not sure what’s changed since then.

By: The Rude Dog

The Rude Dog — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:49:05 +0000

Pah! Calling a nation supporting its military “socialist” is like calling artists, bums, welfare recipients, and failed teachers, a military.
It’s such a misuse of the term, it’s humorous. Supply and logistics is charging a guy for blood on his clothes? Only in the minds of liberals.

You attacked the weapons cost, and defended the worst behaviors as necessary, just like I said libs always do.

Are you sure you are not a closet right winger pretending to be the stereotype?

It’s good to have our favorite dancing bear back. :>

By: DMG

DMG — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:42:20 +0000

Rude, Look, I know you are sure to be in a foul mood today, trust me I’ve been there (exactly 4 and 8 years ago to be exact) but seriously blaming THAT on “liberals” is quite a stretch even for you. I’m sure you will defend Obama here. I’ll remind you from time to time. But back to Military waste. Job creation?? Are you now saying Supply and logistics sergeants are a liberal creation? It takes alot of bureaucracy to run one of Americas great socialist-like institutions.

And you are right cost overruns on weapons development takes real pro’s…dare I say it’s an artform. Cough, cough Bradley…jeez I’m choking…Osprey…please somebody give me the Heimlich maneuver! Anyway, back to work. Good luck with your new endeavor. I might not reply back right away, don’t take that as me ignoring TRN.

By: The Rude Dog

The Rude Dog — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:26:31 +0000

When TIME and other libs attack “bureaucracy”, they mean weapons develepoment and spending. Something that takes real pros.

When the right talks about it, it means garbage like this, that are the direct result of liberal “job creation” polices.

I didn’t have my head under the pillow, I watched Obama tell liberals to stop acting like… well liberals for the last eight years, and derived what pleasure I could for our $170,000,000+ that was blown on his coming out party.

In two years, Obama will be defended from the left on this very site. Why? Because he will socialize the nation too slowly for their taste. He will most likely, most likely, avoid blaming Bush, as that play is tired, but his supporters will continue the garbage. When they think he isn’t “with” them, they will turn on him, like they turn on America time and again.

By: DMG

DMG — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:13:22 +0000

I’m not sure who you are pissed at here. How are “liberals” somehow involved in this? This sort of military bureaucracy has been going on for years. Anyway, Happy Inauguration Day…or H.I.D. for all you right wing types with heads under your pillows moaning and groaning. Hey Rude, happy new year.